An argument against the affirmative action in the united states

Share via Email Demonstrators hold slogans in front of a courthouse in Boston, Massachusetts, on 15 October.

An argument against the affirmative action in the united states

Education Program Affirmative action policies are those in which an institution or organization actively engages in efforts to improve opportunities for historically excluded groups in American society. Affirmative action policies often focus on employment and education.

In institutions of higher education, affirmative action refers to admission policies that provide equal access to education for those groups that have been historically excluded or underrepresented, such as women and minorities.

Controversy surrounding the constitutionality of affirmative action programs has made the topic one of heated debate. Background on Affirmative Action Affirmative action is an outcome of the 's Civil Rights Movement, intended to provide equal opportunities for members of minority groups and women in education and employment.

InPresident Kennedy was the first to use the term "affirmative action" in an Executive Order that directed government contractors to take "affirmative action to ensure that applicants are employed, and that employees are treated during employment, without regard to their race, creed, color, or national origin.

Affirmative action policies initially focused on improving opportunities for African Americans in employment and education. Board of Education decision in outlawing school segregation and the Civil Rights Act of improved life prospects for African Americans.

Affirmative action | Definition, History, & Debate | leslutinsduphoenix.com

Inhowever, only five percent of undergraduate students, one percent of law students, and two percent of medical students in the country were African American. President Lyndon Johnson, an advocate for affirmative action, signed an Executive Order in that required government contractors to use affirmative action policies in their hiring to increase the number of minority employees.

In the following years, colleges and universities began adopting similar recruitment policies, and over time the enrollment rates for African American and Latino students increased steadily.

According to data from the National Center on Education Statistics NCESin70 percent of white high school graduates immediately enrolled in college, compared to 56 percent of African American graduates and 61 percent of Hispanic graduates.

The updated report finds that in69 percent of white high school graduates immediately enrolled in college, compared to 65 percent of African American graduates and 63 percent of Hispanic graduates. The Affirmative Action Debate The use of race as a factor in the college admissions process has been, and continues to be, a hotly debated topic.

 · On October 15, , the topic of affirmative action once again came before the United States Supreme Court. This time, the debate over race-based preferences came to leslutinsduphoenix.com - Affirmative Action - The Battles Against Race-Based Educational Plans California's decision in to outlaw the use of race in public college admissions was widely viewed as the beginning of the end for affirmative action at public universities all over the United leslutinsduphoenix.com://leslutinsduphoenix.com?text=affirmative+action. Critics of affirmative action make the following arguments: Affirmative action was created to ensure fair admission practices and to rectify a long period of racial discrimination. The policy is outdated, however, and causes a form of reverse discrimination by favoring one group over another, based on racial preference rather than academic achievement.

Supporters of affirmative action make the following arguments: Affirmative action is more of a process than just an admissions policy. Colleges and universities reach out to groups that are underrepresented and urge students to apply.

Institutions often offer financial aid to underrepresented students and provide on-campus support programs to improve their academic success.

Affirmative action programs have resulted in doubling or tripling the number of minority applications to colleges or universities, and have made colleges and universities more representative of their surrounding community. Statistics show that after California abolished its affirmative action programs inthe minority student admissions at UC Berkeley fell 61 percent, and minority admissions at UCLA fell 36 percent.

After Texas abolished its affirmative action program inRice University's freshman class had 46 percent fewer African-Americans and 22 percent fewer Hispanic students.

An argument against the affirmative action in the united states

Graduates who benefited from affirmative action programs say that they have received better jobs, earned more money, and ultimately are living better lives because of the opportunity they received. Diversity in higher education provides an educational advantage for all students, both personally and intellectually.

We exist in a global, multicultural society, and in order to achieve success, employers and employees must be able to work effectively with the diverse society that surrounds them.

Affirmative action policies are necessary in order to compensate for centuries of racial, social, and economic oppression. Generally, individuals with higher socioeconomic status have more opportunities than those from lower socioeconomic backgrounds.

Supporters believe that certain racial or ethnic groups are disadvantaged because they are frequently in lower income brackets and consequently are not exposed to the same resources as students from higher socioeconomic classes. Affirmative action was created to ensure fair admission practices and to rectify a long period of racial discrimination.

The policy is outdated, however, and causes a form of reverse discrimination by favoring one group over another, based on racial preference rather than academic achievement. · Affirmative action may be unconstitutional under the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution.

Likewise, the programs may be illegal under Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of , which prohibits discrimination based on race, color or national origin by recipients of federal financial leslutinsduphoenix.com  · The Case Against Affirmative Action If, after 25 years, affirmative action has not succeeded in ending discrimination, perhaps it is time to try something else.

September/October Reading time min. By. David Sacks and Peter leslutinsduphoenix.com://leslutinsduphoenix.com the supreme courts ruling in brown v board of education was based on the legal argument that segregation violated the ____ amandment. the supreme court ruled against some of the basic principals of affirmative action in which of the following cases?

in the case dred scott v sandford the united states supreme court. ruled that a black leslutinsduphoenix.com “Affirmative action” means positive steps taken to increase the representation of women and minorities in areas of employment, education, and culture from which they have been historically leslutinsduphoenix.com://leslutinsduphoenix.com United States () regarding the internment of those with Japanese ancestry living in the United States?

What is the status of affirmative action in college admissions after the Supreme Court decisions in the two cases involving the University of Michigan, Gratz v. Government - Chapter 5 - Civil Rights. 47 terms.

Tri. 2 Chapter 5 leslutinsduphoenix.com  · Terry Eastland, The Case Against Affirmative Action, 34 Wm. & Mary L. Rev. 33 (), the United States is indeed a nation of many peoples and As Sowell notes, some have made the argument in a more socio-logical way, to wit, that blacks and other minorities living today leslutinsduphoenix.com?article=&context=wmlr.

41 Affirmative Action Reverse Discrimination Statistics - leslutinsduphoenix.com