Common sense views of the world Widely held historical and scientific opinion Plausible moral principles  As a response to the problem of evil, a theodicy is distinct from a defence. A defence attempts to demonstrate that the occurrence of evil does not contradict God's existence, but it does not propose that rational beings are able to understand why God permits evil. A theodicy seeks to show that it is reasonable to believe in God despite evidence of evil in the world and offers a framework which can account for why evil exists. The broad concept picks out any bad state of affairs
I have to admit, when I first opened Sean Carroll's new book, The Big Picture: On the Origins of Life, Meaning, and the Universe Itself (Dutton, ) I immediately flipped to chapter 25, titled "Why Does the Universe Exist?" For many thinkers, ancient and modern, this is the philosophical question. Really a wonderful exposition, Baxter. Thank you for writing it. I am reminded of the struggle I have always had of reconciling a good God with the doctrine of an ever-burning, torment-filled hell as a place of eternal punishment meted out by a holy and just God. Despite the scientific and philosophical arguments for the existence of God presented on this website and elsewhere, some readers may still be haunted by a persistent question: If he is more than just an imaginary big-daddy-in-the-sky, why does it seem that God is hiding from us?
Although rigorously logical and thoroughly biblical, in a curious sort of way, somewhere inside I always knew that fundamental errors loomed at the core of the Calvinist system.
Before I set forward my main points as to why I left Calvinism, I want to make two important comments. Apart from his doctrine of reprobation see Institutes III. XXIwhich he got from Augustine, I find the Institutes to be beautifully written, even devotional, and certainly far more moving than the type of theology handed down by his descendents, which reads more like religious insurance manuals than its does a song of someone who loves God.
Calvin is cut from a different piece of cloth than the Calvinists. Second, I believe that the larger Christian community owes a serious does god really exist essay writer to Calvinism.
Almost single-handedly it has maintained an interest in the stunning, gospel-filled doctrine of election.
Granted, that what it gives with the one hand election is trueit takes away with the other it is only true for somebut what could be more stunning than the truth that we were known and loved and indeed embraced by the Father, Son and Spirit from all eternity.
My beef with the Calvinists here is not with the fact of our election, but with the way they limit it, and thus limit its preaching as the unconditional truth for all.
Be that as it may, I am grateful to my own tradition for keeping the heart of the gospel before us, even in its limited form. What the Calvinists think is true for only a few, should be proclaimed to every person on the planet: My question is, where did such a notion originate? This relationship is the eternal and deepest truth about God.
God is Father, Son and Spirit—always has been and always will be—and therefore every thought of God, every idea, every dream, and every plan of this God is relational, flowing out of the relationship of the Father, Son and Spirit.
Athanasius, thankfully, rocked my Calvinistic world. The ideas that God would elect some to salvation and pass others by, or outright reject them, must be, theologically speaking, grounded in this relationship.
It is obvious how election to adoption would flow out of the Father-Son relationship, for the Father loves the Son and shares all things with him in the Spirit.
So it is not out of character or odd that the blessed Trinity would think of including others in the trinitarian life. But why would this God think of excluding?
What about the life that the Triune God lives would ever lead to the deliberate damning of people? Does such an idea flow out of the way the Father and Son relate? Is there are part or side of the Father that is disinterested in his Son, neutral, even eager to dismiss, look over, and, indeed, to reject him?
Is there something deeper about God than the love and fellowship of the Father, Son and Spirit? Is there a god behind the back of the Trinity who ultimately calls the shots?
So for me, the doctrine of double predestination of electing some and damning others is patently non-Christian, because it cannot be grounded in the blessed life and way of relating of the Father, Son and Spirit.
And if you cannot say that there is a part of the Father that eternally rejects his beloved Son and who would dare think of such a thingthen there is no theological basis—in the being of God—for positing why God would think of passing by or rejecting large parts of his creation, or even conceive of such sadness.
I am with them here. The apostles are crystal clear that it was in and through and by and for Jesus that all things came into being and are sustained.
Let me cite a few verses. He was in the beginning with God.Part I: Introduction--What inspired my argumentative response?
For decades, too many high-school teachers have been instilling persuasive writing skills by teaching students the five-paragraph essay.
This is strikingly beautiful – one of the best I’ve read from you. One somewhat rambling thought I took away from this post, oddly enough, is that – in the face of a potential superintelligence – the status quo is not the only alternative to trying to build a Friendly AI.
FREE COURSE THE WORLD, THE JEWS AND THE SCIENCE OF HUMAN SURVIVAL Anti-Semitism, division, separation, violent conflicts and a general breakdown of the institutions of human society.
God Does Exist This paper argues that St.
Fideisms Judaism is the Semitic monotheistic fideist religion based on the Old Testament's ( BCE) rules for the worship of Yahweh by his chosen people, the children of Abraham's son Isaac (c BCE).. Zoroastrianism is the Persian monotheistic fideist religion founded by Zarathustra (cc BCE) and which teaches that good must be chosen over evil in order to achieve salvation. Tom Wolfe has chronicled American popular culture for more than three decades. His best–selling books include The Electric Kool–Aid Acid Test, The Right Stuff, and The Bonfire of the Vanities. Hire a highly qualified essay writer to cater for all your content needs. Whether you struggle to write an essay, coursework, research paper, annotated bibliography or dissertation, we’ll connect you with a screened academic writer for effective writing assistance.
Thomas Aquinas has a better argument for the existence of god. He says it is possible to prove that the traditional God exist. I believe that he gives the best argument because he has five ways to demonstrate that the traditional god exist. Really a wonderful exposition, Baxter.
Thank you for writing it. I am reminded of the struggle I have always had of reconciling a good God with the doctrine of an ever-burning, torment-filled hell as a place of eternal punishment meted out by a holy and just God.
Also, “it starts to look like me and the feminists” should be “looks like I”. And “untitled” doesn’t really make sense. And if biology is a hard science, it’s on the extreme soft edge of hard sciences.